第4条 禁止事项中的
(d). 未经许可将本服务所获信息用于商业用途的行为
英文原文
5. 禁止行为
d) 未经许可的商业使用
关于上述内容，
我是否可以理解为：利用本网站获取或记载的“操作指南”（How-to）所开发的游戏，原则上不得有偿公开发布；若要进行有偿发布（商业用途），需联系指定的咨询窗口，并履行规定的手续？
Regarding the above,
is my understanding correct that games developed using the “How-to” information obtained from or described on this site cannot be publicly released for a fee in principle, and that in order to release them for a fee (commercial use), there is a designated contact point at the inquiry desk and specific procedures must be followed?
此外，对于未来可能增多的、从过往论坛转载的文章，是否也属于本“服务”范围？目前已有偿公开发布的作品，若进行版本升级，是否也将被视为“未经许可的商业使用”？
Is it correct to interpret that articles reprinted from past forums, which are likely to increase in the future, also fall under this “service,” and that works currently available for a fee, if they undergo version upgrades, will also be subject to “unauthorized commercial use”?
是否可以认为，该限制范围不仅限于与RPG Maker系列相关的信息，还包括更广泛的JavaScript和Ruby技术，以及通用的游戏设计知识？
It can be considered that the scope of regulation extends not only to information related to the RPGMaker series, but also to a broader range of technologies related to Javascript and Ruby, as well as general game design knowledge.
极端地说，例如：
“RPG的女主角应该可爱。她们学习的技能，最好能在最终BOSS战中发挥作用。”
即使是这样的感想，若被视为“通过本服务获得的信息”，并严格适用该条款，则大多数出版商都将落入限制范围。
To put it in extreme terms, for example,
“RPG heroines should be cute. The skills they learn should be useful in the final boss battle,”
even such a comment could be considered “information obtained through this service,” which would mean that the vast majority of publishers would be included in the scope.
英文版本仅表述为“d) 未经许可的商业使用”，希望您能就这一差异予以说明。
The English version simply states “d) Unauthorized commercial use,” so I would appreciate it if you could also mention that difference.
使用谷歌翻译